Now that I am no longer involved in the discussion of Gamergate, I feel as though I can finally come clean about my true motivations for joining the discussion in the first place. I have often been asked the question about my initial draw to GG, and games in general, and while I have always answered truthfully, it was an incomplete truth. This will be my final time mentioning Gamergate in any fashion.
I was very sick when I was a teenager, originally diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue and Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS), Fibromyalgia, and Anemia. I later learned that I actually have Lupus. That did not, however, change the fact that using the medication that was prescribed almost killed me. That I was homeschooled throughout most of highschool due to my inability to function. That I found solace, and true friendship, through gaming. That those friendships most likely saved my life.
While I’m fairly certain those experiences alone would have propelled me into discussion of Gamergate, there is a very big factor that I have omitted until recently, and which was my true primary motivation.
In August of 2014, a friend on Twitter drew my attention to several articles that had been posted, later dubbed the “Gamers are Dead” articles. The first I read was by Gamasutra writer Leigh Alexander. In this article, Ms. Alexander described “gamers” in the following way:
“They don’t know how to dress or behave….. ‘Games culture’ is a petri dish of people who know so little about how human social interaction and professional life works that they can concoct online ‘wars’ about social justice or ‘game journalism ethics……”
She used an entire article to demonize a certain, and very specific, type of person. A young man, who isn’t socially tuned into her idea of ‘acceptable’ social behavior. Who doesn’t know the right way to behave, or engage, or dress, or shop, or live. Who cares about things she does not.
Leigh Alexander was describing a male version of my 3 year old daughter.
My little girl was diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Global Developmental Delay days after her second birthday. We were blessed enough to receive an iPad grant through a local foundation, which opened up a huge world to her. She began using PECS (picture communication) to request time with her iPad. She then began using it to request other things. Her first word was “iPad,” and she had an inexplicable fascination with Fruit Ninja. I had always been the sort of parent to limit television and electronics to certain times and amounts. That all went out the window with her.
Went out the window because the only reason I ever heard my baby girl’s voice was because of a game.
At the age of 3, she can now identify every letter in the alphabet out of order, upper and lowercase. She can count to 30, and backwards from 20, without a single error. She can spell words. She can identify every color and shape. Yet, she can not say “no” if she doesn’t want something. She can not express when she DOES want something. She can not socialize with other children, or with adults. She will fall into a sensory meltdown and can not tell us how to help ease her struggles.
She does not know the ‘right’ way to behave, or engage, or dress. She is the person Leigh Alexander described with blatant and unapologetic contempt.
I discussed Gamergate because I cared about ethics. I discussed Gamergate because I cared about censorship. I discussed Gamergate because I cared about ideological manipulation. But, I started discussing Gamergate because I’m a mother. A mother who’s child was being misunderstood. A mother who’s child was being attacked. A mother who saw a woman – a privileged, spoiled woman – talking about things she’s never lived and could never understand. A mother who watched this woman vilify all of the things I love most about my child – her ability to focus, to understand, to slow down, and most importantly, to be, and love, herself. And that pissed me off.
My motivation, my first, primary motivation, for joining the discussion was selfish. And I don’t apologize for that.
We are all people. We all have our own motivations. We are all human beings, with feelings. And we all deserve to be treated with some goddamn dignity.
To be honest if I was a parent I probably would be like that too, what Leigh said was out of order in every possible way and you don’t need to explain yourself or apologize because most of us can relate
LikeLike
You realise that Leigh didn’t describe the male version of your daughter, because what Leigh described was a stereotype, a stereotype that should be on its way out. You need to learn how to see what someone is writing from their perspective and not your own. Sure, if I had a son with diseases such as your daughter reading a piece on how youth need to get out more and games are not healthy I’d react. Please, though, realise that this has no whatsoever relation to your daughter. Leigh is describing people who become socially inept and unable to evolve past ethics they see every day (in their chosen games). This is an issue not so much because of games, but because everyone is born different and at some point some of these kids will feel left out of the society they are growing up in and turn to something else (in this case games), and games, like any other hobby, can become quite addicting. Leigh is describing a tendency in a part of that population segment who overreach with their mistaken ideas and actually end up causing harm (they are not the only ones in this world, but an issue never the less).
Mind that seeing it from your perspective and the perspective of many others, including me, her article is quite offensive. As I was, and probably still is to some extent, the person she is describing. Still I can see the person she is describing, and I admit that that person is indeed in need of changing. In fact most kids growing up these days playing games will not find the stigma you, me and many others faced when we grew up. This stigma has stuck with us, and it isolated us, and though that might not be the only reason for how many of us became so socially inept (like you mentioned your diseases being a main reason for you taking up games), it’s still a piece of us that we are now responsible for.
Just think about it. What is gamergate actually fighting for? Is there anything to defend, really?
LikeLiked by 1 person
To be honest, the right to create without restriction or having some sort of ideology shoved down our throats left right and center, the right to transparency and loyalty to the consumer base…..there’s quite alot of things GG is trying to defend and obtain
LikeLike
Autism != a disease
Autism is very prevalent amongst gamers (not because games make you autistic but because people on the spectrum are attracted to games)
The stereotype of a gamer IS pretty much someone on the autism spectrum.
LikeLike
Autism is not a disease.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with Dragon, I’m a father of three myself and would surely not want these kinds of ideas floating around when they get to be older and exposed to them. Fortunately in my case, they will not understand (and therefore suffer) all these shenanigans too soon for English is not spoken in my country, but still I can relate quite powerfully to your feels. No apologies are needed, you’re only being the best mother your daughter can possibly have!
LikeLike
You are not alone in this reasoning, although at least your motivations were the altruistic love of a parent. Mine was more self-centered, I’m afraid. It isn’t something I discuss often — indeed, I feel ambivalent about mentioning it now, but your post was rather inspiring so I will share it. I have Aspergers, or at least I was diagnosed with it as a child. As you probably know it is a lesser degree of Autistic Spectrum. I loathe the diagnosis. Even thinking about it is bothersome, and for the most part I try to forget.
In any event, gaming provided a similar sort of outlet for me. Back in the day, nerds and dorks were not so different from me. Gamers had a culture that welcomed me and others like me. They were kind people, mostly, even if they were often crass and cavalier too. Over time, it got to the point that I figured out what Leigh Alexander is referring to — how to be “normal” even if it was a sort of artificial state for me. In the real world, nobody knows I have it unless I choose to tell them — which is exceptionally rare. But I never forgot that gamers, nerds and dorks were the only ones that said “you know what, we don’t care that you’re kind of weird, come hang out with us.” And it was fun.
And so when I saw how poorly SJWs treated them, how gamers were accused of all sorts of discrimination and hate, I knew immediately that it was not only a lie, but the exact, 180 degree opposite of truth. They were the most welcoming, warm-hearted people I had ever met. I felt a strong need to defend them and their community, of which I had been an occasional part of.
LikeLike
WHY CAN’T I HOLD ALL THESE FEELS?!
LikeLike
That was beautiful. I’m autistic, and it was painfully obvious that it was people like me that Leigh Alexander is talking about and want “over.” People like you give me hope.
Thank you for writing this; I wish everyone in the Gamergate controversy could read it and understand it.
LikeLike
Been walking point for all the Aspies here all my life. Hit me as well. I escaped intp arcade games through school, and o. My Spectrum.
LikeLike
This hits uncomfortably close to home. My daughter and yours have the same condition and behave almost identically. I completely understand your motivations and applaud your restraint: my blood boils at merely reading your synopsis.
FWIW, while your comparatively calm and rational voice will be missed, I can understand your motivations for bowing out. My own wife (another Liz, oddly enough) has undergone enormous hardship for our daughter and would do anything to keep her protected, as would I.
Be well, and I will include your family in my prayers. As an aside, my daughter has two years on yours, and has learned how to express when she wants something and the meltdowns have diminished significantly, though she still doesn’t talk much. It CAN get better, and yours is already ahead of where mine was at her age.
Thank you again for the work you did, and best wishes from my family to you and yours
LikeLike
I can relate. My husband has learning difficulties and has gamed all his life to cope with them. Now our daughter has learning difficulties, it’s looking like our son may have too. They BOTH love playing games with us on the iPad and PC. I don’t want the world to be a scary place for them, I don’t want them to be feared and ostracised because they find it difficult to learn and play the same way that other children do. My husband doesn’t want them to suffer the way he did, technology and gaming has made it far easier for them to learn, made them more comfortable with who they are and helped them grow. I would not take that away from them for all the world and I will not let some bunch of jumped up bloggers and unethical wannabe art critics shut them out. Much love to you and your family Liz, take care.
LikeLike
I am on the autistic spectrum, and I mention this merely to demonstrate that if my daughter was condescended to by someone because of her mental state I would be very upset that someone was making light of such an affecting condition that I have experience with. But while your intentions were good, I can’t help feel that in jumping to her defense you ignored so much of the key detail about posts about the gamer identity. There were a number of pieces written by men and women about what being a gamer meant, notably, that it was changing, and how this would affect the industry that markets towards mainly white heterosexual young males. It’s not just about the stereotypes, it’s about seeing those stereotypes are being erased thanks to the cultural idea of a gamer becoming less exclusive.
https://pixietalksgamergate.wordpress.com/gamers-are-dead-article-analysis/
I understand that her description read like someone who is on the spectrum, but in my opinion she was talking about anyone who exhibited social awkwardness, NOT just autistic children. And social awkwardness is not confined to just a diagnosis, but CAN come from shyness, or just inexperience with social situations. What I think is that Leigh was talking not about social awkwardness itself, but the SPECIFIC kind that makes them lash out via anonymous posts or scoff at “fake girl gamers” or whine about “feminists” wanting to “take away their games.” It’s feeling marginalized by liking something, and then lashing out at any criticism of it because you they are protective of what they see as their identity.
It seems unfair to group children who have genuine difficulty thanks to a diagnosis with those who are just exercising a chip on their shoulders, but to ignore how the culture has enabled this subset of awful people to get away with misogynistic comments and harassing other women into leaving the community is even more affecting. Your daughter may be welcome, but there are so many others who have been forced out or come to believe gaming isn’t for them thanks to those small subset of socially awkward gamers who defend their identity by calling others fake or proposition women on the mike.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2013/01/27/women-remain-outsiders-video-game-industry/275JKqy3rFylT7TxgPmO3K/story.html
http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/22/5926193/women-gaming-harassment
http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2012/11/women-video-game-industry-twitter-1reasonwhy
And this quote: “Death and rape threats I can deal with emotionally, what takes the biggest toll is when young girls write me and tell me they’re too scared to go into this field” -Brianna Wu
It’s not fair that a generalization like that would demonize your daughter for being socially awkward, or claim there’s a “right way to dress, shop, or live,” but it’s an equally great injustice that bad gamers will use the belief that they are “under attack” by articles like this to justify their harassment, and ignore the fact that THEY are turning away people from sharing that identity. The culture is toxic to many women, and the reason is that gamer’s identity is so personal to them that any criticism of the things it holds dear are viewed as attack, even when it’s a woman saying that she wishes she could participate without dealing with the bad parts. For that reason, we NEED to read these articles and really sparse out their meaning, because while it may inadvertently offend some who are socially awkward or on the spectrum, if we do not look at the root of where this toxicity stems from, all we’re doing is saying that the problem isn’t too great yet for us to put our priorities with the people who actively suffer, than those who are merely insulted.
To close, I’ll quote from Leigh in a part I think is more important than any of the indictments against social awkwardness, and is about the call for anyone who is passionate about the community to take responsibility for the reality of what many others’ experience, whether they agree with it or not.
“Yet disclaiming liability is clearly no help. Game websites with huge community hubs whose fans are often associated with blunt Twitter hate mobs sort of shrug, they say things like ‘we delete the really bad stuff, what else can we do’ and ‘those people don’t represent our community’ — but actually, those people do represent your community. That’s what your community is known for, whether you like it or not. When you decline to create or to curate a culture in your spaces, you’re responsible for what spawns in the vacuum. That’s what’s been happening to games.”
LikeLike
I feel like an answer like this to a beautiful article like that just glazes over all the points she made and becomes a talking point for yourself. While I respect your views as any other human should I can’t help but feel like your view comes from a privileged viewpoint that isn’t taking into account that those awkward children grow up and the gaming community often accepts them. Are there outliers in the gaming community? Of course there are, just as anywhere in this world there are bad people willing to hurt people for any amount of reasons. Any profession or hobby harbors these people, often without anyone doing much to curb it because in reality that is real life and you can’t create bubbles where people don’t get hurt everywhere.
The gaming community has stated over and over that this is such a small extremely vocal part that it is basically inconsequential to gaming as a whole but the people against “gamers” will just not hear it, as you have practiced here. The one sided argument that you have again expressed here shows how much of an uphill battle it is for any anti-gamergater to listen to literally any viewpoint besides that poisonous one Leigh Alexander has brought forward.
The reason that article offended me is that I have a wife that was diagnosed with PTSD 3 years ago and she has found solace in the gaming community. When i was in the military and I would go on deployment our guild was a major support system for her and she delved into that world for a good portion of her day. It gave her people to talk with and relate to as well as a distraction from her own mind. Alexander called her out that day, she is awkward, goes against norms in social behaviors, hangs out in pajamas most days and felt offended by that article. So at the end of the day who are you really fighting for, gamers? Not really. Women? That one doesn’t fit either. At the end of the day you are fighting for a cause and have lost all sight of the people you have hurt along the way. I will fight for people before a cause any day, that is why I have never accepted gamergate as a place for me, maybe you should look at your own movement and see if it is doing more hurt than good.
LikeLike
Sad to say, I see a lot of GGers on here that I recognize as known harassers and enablers. People who have continuously downplayed abuse, denied the behavior of GG’s biggest voices, and refused to take responsibility for even the most obvious GG influenced events. If you consider these people your allies in the movement, without taking into consideration what their behavior says about what the gaming community is willing to tolerate you’re in part condoning their actions, and the actions of the community they reside in. And saying that while you try to mansplain (not a man, but it still fits) why there ISN’T a problem with misogyny and harassment in the community, even after I posted all those links coming from countless individuals, is extremely disingenuous.
“that it is basically inconsequential to gaming as a whole but the people against “gamers” will just not hear it, as you have practiced here.”
You won’t hear it, because you’re convinced that the parts you see are more representative of the community, but in doing so you show you’re willing to tolerate parts of the community that are INTOLERABLE for many others, especially women. You’ll bring up personal notes to show how it’s NOT ALL GAMERS, but NOBODY thinks it’s all gamers, it’s just enough of them to create a community where enough of the female gamers experience harassment that they often lose interest.
“At the end of the day you are fighting for a cause and have lost all sight of the people you have hurt along the way.”
The irony is so thick in I can barely breathe. You’ll get mad at a woman for writing an article that offends a person very dear to you, but meh it when countless women speak up about why they don’t feel like they can work in the industry, or find such hostility that they fear for their lives. How do you see a few words that include your wife by basis of a catagory the speaker is subsequently deconstructing as more relevant than the countless people who receive death threats or harassment or are told point blank they “don’t belong?”
I imagine it takes quite a strong neck to hold up those glasses needed to correct your chronic nearsightedness. I just wish instead of just sticking it out just for people you care about, you’d be more inclined to sticking it out for the community, and not just the ones who believe there isn’t a problem.
Because there is. And it doesn’t matter if it’s a small part, ignoring it just gives it more strength. There is no law of averages when a hobby becomes a justification for hate.
http://nymphamos-the-mad.tumblr.com/post/110916282648/comfemgem-imahyperlover-welcome-to-the-gaming
LikeLike
“What I think is that Leigh was talking not about social awkwardness itself, but the SPECIFIC kind that makes them lash out via anonymous posts or scoff at “fake girl gamers” or whine about “feminists” wanting to “take away their games.””
No. Alexander made it quite clear that she was talking about the kind of social awkwardness that makes people “lonely basement kids” who “don’t know how to dress,” wear dorky mushroom hats, and spend time with other weirdoes doing stuff Alexander thinks is lame, like attending midnight releases. The fact that she then lumped these traits together genuinely bad things like misogyny and death threats make her more despicable, not less.
The consistent refusal of people who defend the article to even acknowledge what it plainly says makes it very hard to believe defenses of it are being made in good faith.
LikeLike
I don’t have the evidence at hand, and this is off the top of my head so it’s a mite unorganised, but I absolutely must share my thesis with you. Any bit you disagree with, you can ask for citations.
–
I do not think gaming is toxic to women, misogynistic, or otherwise anti-female. There are *absolutely* many women who are disgusted, scared, or disapprove of gaming, and some of those women are disgusted by the overtly sexualised characters, or scared by the gender-based insults and casual slang use of ‘rape’ they encounter in gaming. But gaming is not toxic to women, misogynistic, or anti-female. It is simply a certain culture of interaction, a specific set of rules on how to interact, a shared cluster of social norms.
This cluster diverges (sharply) from what we might consider ‘normal society’. Who is important and who is not, who’s high-status and who isn’t – this is implicit, hidden, obscured in normal society. Figuring out who is ‘cool’ (and therefore social suicide to disagree with) or ‘uncool’ (and therefore socially rewarding to mock) is a task requiring well-developed social skills. Knowing where you stand in this social hierarchy (and therefore how to climb in it – who to be friends with, who to dump) requires a finely-honed social intuition.
In gaming, one look at the scoreboard tells you all of that. Who is to be respected? The player with a 4:1 k:d ratio on 350 ping. Who is to be mocked? The player on the bottom of the DPS chart. Simple. These evaluations require no social skills to make, and more importantly, no social skills to achieve. How pretty or funny you are, how much of a social butterfly you are, has no bearing on your in-game results. If you perform better than the other person, the game puts your name above them.
Contrast this with normal society. Don’t be a show-off. Stop bragging. Don’t outshine your boss. Don’t outdo your colleagues too much, you’ll make them look bad. For someone without great social skills, it very often seems that outperforming someone will get you knocked to the bottom of the social hierarchy. Doing better than someone makes you worse than them!?
The appeal of gaming to a certain type of person might be clearer now.
The gender skew of gaming is evidence that there are more men than women who really take to this environment. That is not misogynistic or sexist; we know an actual gender difference is that there is greater variance in the male brain and psychology – “more geniuses and more idiots”, as it was once put. A greater variance in the social skills of men means the bottom 10% of people will be mostly men. Gaming eschews the need for social skills in order to be respected, everyone wants respect, the least socially skilled will obviously find gaming very attractive, the least socially skilled are mostly men because of a quirk of our biological gender differences, gaming is therefore mostly men. (Analogously, competitive sport rewards physical capability, the most physically capable are mostly men due to a quirk of our biological gender differences, sports careers are therefore mostly men.)
Now, those insults and slurs that get thrown around. When you feel a moment of dislike for a person, this could be expressed as an insult. In normal society, you can only get away with insulting someone waaay down at the bottom of the social standing. (Think about who ‘mean girl’ cliques at high school mocked.) The closer they are to an average social standing, the more you have to modulate your insult into a criticism. The higher in social standing they are, the more you have to further modulate that – into silence. (“Oh my god, you can’t just tell the boss he’s wrong!”)
In gaming, you just insult the person. You know and they know it’s just a momentary expression of dislike, neither of you thinks the other is on the lowest rungs of the gaming respect hierarchy, and the actual question of where you both stand will be answered by the scoreboard at the end of the round. It’s just trash talk.
People low in social status are used to being insulted, because they are acceptable targets for insults. If someone not low in social status decides to join the community, they are expected to play by the rules of the gaming community. If instead they try to play by normal society’s rules, and take offence at being insulted when they ‘clearly aren’t a loser’, of course they won’t be welcomed by gamers.
“Get a life, loser” is the slogan of the person who can’t handle the banter, who wants to be respected in the gaming community just because they are respected in normal society.
“Who gives a shit about your stupid score. You keep playing your silly games, I’m going to go [sleep with attractive people/have fun at a party/etc] because society respects me and it doesn’t respect you” is that person retreating from the gamer hierarchy and trying to appeal to the normal social hierarchy. But gamers retreated from the social hierarchy to the gaming hierarchy precisely because they didn’t like being stuck at the bottom of the social hierarchy!
An analogy: a burly blue-collar construction worker walks into a swanky cocktail party and starts acting like he owns the place. Anyone who tells him he’s being disrespectful, he challenges them to a fistfight (which he would obviously win). This person has come into their community, demanded respect while refusing to play by their rules of how respect works, and when challenged uses his better standing in another hierarchy (capacity for physical violence) – one that the community has deliberately *avoided* – to reinforce his unfair demand for unearned respect. Pretty much everyone everywhere thinks this dude is in the wrong. Likewise if a swanky cocktail-party guy tried to pull this shit in a pub full of construction workers. This is exactly the kind of shit that our “screw your games, I can get laid, can you?” person is trying to pull in the gaming community, and that person is every bit as wrong for doing it.
Now look at what games journalism is doing with those ‘gamers are dead’ articles. “You are low on the social hierarchy. You need to respect people higher on the social hierarchy than you. Stop behaving like the gaming community and start behaving like the social hierarchy dictates. You need to live up to the social hierarchy’s standards, because gaming is for everyone now.” Etc.
In the same way that the world of the game is an escape from reality (despite the fact that both you and the game exist within reality), the gaming community is a respite from the usual rules of society (despite taking place within society). One of the rules of society is that you have to be nice to women. That rule used to be expressed as “it’s chivalrous not to swear in front of women”; now the rule is expressed as “it’s sexist/misogynistic to use a woman’s gender to insult her”.
Well, you come to our community, you play by our rules. And those rules are “everyone insults everyone, nobody gives a shit, and what matters is the score on the board at the end of the round.” Nowhere in our rule book does it say a women’s gender is off-limits. That’s in society’s rule book. Stop trying to make us live by your rules just because you want to join our community but aren’t willing to behave by our rules.
So you see what Leigh Alexander and all the others are doing? They don’t have any respect in the gaming hierarchy, they’ve been a joke to us for decades. They do have respect the social hierarchy, though. Quite a lot of respect, seeing as they’re journalists. They are trying to tear down our community, declare it over, because they like living in the social hierarchy. They take the side of women who were ‘scared off’ from gaming – yet the constant refrain from women *actually* in gaming is “if a few mean words scares you off, if you aren’t willing to prove yourself by putting up a good score, you *don’t want to be a gamer*, you wouldn’t enjoy it at all”. Games journalists want us to give these women the respect that society says they are due, but they haven’t earned any respect!
But much, much more importantly, these journalists want to *take away* the respect that gamers have earned – with hours of practice and years of dedication – because society says we don’t deserve it.
We’re not an immature boys’ club, refusing to let any girls in. We are losers, misfits who’ve banded together to give each other a loving, supportive community – a tropical paradise island in the ocean of uncaring disdain that is society-as-experienced-by-the-outcasts.
Journalists like Leigh aren’t “breaking into the boys’ club”, they’re breaking into our homes.
In The Art of War, Sun Tzu describes several types of ground that wars may be fought on, and advises tactics and strategies for each on how to do battle, plus whether and when to retreat. One of the grounds he describes is the last resort, grounds which you cannot retreat from. He calls these places ‘death grounds’. Here he eschews his usual pragmatic advice and simply says:
“On death ground, fight.”
To my knowledge, there have been two members of GamerGate who’ve tried to commit suicide in the last six months. There are undoubtedly more. On both attempts, the community as one threw itself into the challenge of getting that person to safety. A person whose anguish society couldn’t care less about, who was in that situation in part because of society.
I’ve gone to work exhausted and bleary-eyed because I and fellow guildmembers stayed up all night running 5-man dungeons and shooting the shit on Vent. Not for the loot, but because one of those guys had just gotten expelled from school for retaliating against a bully, and was preparing to kill himself. I don’t know where he is now, whether he got help or not, whether he’s even still alive, but I do know that we saved his life that night.
Since we’re coming clean…
If I hadn’t found games when I did, I would not be writing this today. I would be dead. From overdose or stepping in front of a train, I would be dead. Gaming gave me a community when society kicked me out. Gaming gave me respect when society spat on me, kicked me, mocked my pain.
Gaming – no, *gamers* – saved my fucking life.
For a small part of GamerGate, Sun Tzu is right in a very literal sense: gaming is our death ground. We cannot retreat from this community, we cannot let society take this from us. It’s just about all some of us have left.
Felicia Day, in her now-infamous blog post, wrote about how she hated socialising and felt awkward about it (and I feel for her) but when she saw a gamer, she knew she could immediately get along with them (which is awesome!). They had a shared interest, they could skip right past the awkwardness to being friendly. That’s really great. Imagine someone with Felicia Day’s social anxiety, but none of her charm, wit, beauty, or sex appeal. Girls like that, they don’t just face awkwardness, but outright hostility when they socialise (think of high school cliques, yet again). But they still have that hotline to friendship with other gamers, no matter what. So it’s no surprise that women in NotYourShield feel so strongly that gaming is one of the most welcoming places ever for them. Now think about what journalists are trying to do – they are trying to make gaming accept women in the same way that the rest of society already accepts women. You know, the society that isn’t accepting of women who don’t behave like the fragile snowflakes they are supposed to be?
We had a good thing going. As Felicia points out, though, now she crosses the street out of fear of gamers hating women. Journalists lay the blame on ‘hardcore gamers’ and GamerGate. But if we are clinging to the way we have always been, if we are lashing out because we like things the way they are, and journalists are the ones bringing change with their ‘gamers are dead’ articles, then Felicia Day should have always been terrified of gamers, all her life, and the 28th of August should have been the day she stopped crossing the street, because she was no longer afraid.
Instead, this is when her fear *began*. What does that say about the “change” journalists are bringing? And what does that say about the culture in gaming, the one that journalists claim has been “left alone for years” and “allowed to fester for too long”? Who’s really the bad guy here? Who’s really responsible for the recent wave of hate that’s terrorising women? It can’t be gamers, because we’re stuck in our rut, unwilling to change, remember? We’ve been like this forever. So where oh where could the hate be coming from? Could it be that, by trying to open up gaming to the rest of society, journalists have opened up gaming to to the very people who mock and ridicule and hate those loser gamers? Who mocked and ridiculed and hated these socially awkward misfits so much that they ended up finding solace in a culture where taunts are so commonplace as to be meaningless, where most insults are known to have no hate behind them? Where the few occasions of actual malice were resolved by putting a better score in the board?
Could it be that a woman in gaming is now ‘living in fear’ because journalists are trying to bring in all the people she came to gaming to escape from?
Games journalists are out to tear this community down and replace it with one that respects them by default, because they are scrubs who want to be respected but are too fucking lazy to git gud.
They want to trample our version of equality – “behind the keyboard, everyone is equal” (thank you, based Hotwheels) – and import their ‘women are fragile snowflakes’ brand of feminism. They want to trample our codes of conduct, our cultural context for words, and declare wider society the arbiter of how this subculture should behave.
We built our little outpost, our safe space away from society, and now our journalists – who treated us with contempt and thought they could get away with rampant favouritism because hey, it’s not like society respects their audience, so why should they? – now, our journalists are trying to demolish our safe haven so they can pave over it with yet more society. If they want things to be like the rest of society so bad, well, the rest of society is *right there*, go get a job in it you dishonest hacks and leave us gamers alone.
We aren’t worried that you’re coming to steal our games.
We’re scared to fucking death that you’re coming to destroy our community.
On death ground, fight.
LikeLike
I’d probably be dead without gaming, too. That Sun Tzu quote is exactly what’s come to mind for me, for months now. The game press clique got arrogant, they kept attacking people who had nowhere left to retreat to and now they’re paying for it.
Great post all-round. You should consider turning it into an article, try to get it published somewhere.
LikeLike
I can kinda feel you on this one to some extent. I’ve joined the GG (band)wagon like a month ago and have been following the whole SJW nonsense for few months now. And it’s quite tiresome. Especially since it feels like Don Quixote’s story. But I just can’t be silent. You can leave all the GG stuff behind, but if you like games the way they are, you can’t just sit aside and be silent while these SJW fuckers are tearing our hobby down to their needs and walking all over us yet again. I could just say, do whatever you want, I don’t care, but I just can’t. Not now, not this time.
Main reason for this is because gamers have been abused and harassed because of what they loved in the past. Games. Years went by and here they are these SJW’s doing exactly the same thing to us as those bullies in the past. And this time it’s even worse, because they are now, they aren’t just attacking us, they are actually attacking our hobby. I can ignore, mute, or redirect insults and abuse being thrown at me, but when they tear down our hobby, gaming, with all the media machinery backing them up. And there is no way in hell I won’t fight this one. I love games the way they are and if we’re lose them, we’ll basically also lose our identity. My identity. It might sound silly, but that’s how I feel about it.
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing, Liz. You are a beautiful person.
Send my love to your family.
LikeLike
The person she described is a lot of us. She described me, both in my youth, and to some extent now. She described my friends. She described the people I care about. She attacked me the same way that kids in high school attacked me. And I wasn’t going to take it. As someone who now fights for those who DON’T fight for their rights because they are socially conditioned not to (you know who I mean Lizzy), I am not going to sit down and take the shit they shovelled out to us under the label of “journalism”. The blatant and misandric way they started their attack only strengthens my resolve. While I don’t have the instinct of a parent protecting their young, and never will, I do know what it is like to have someone you care about attacked by blind bigots. And I am NEVER letting them do that again without a fight. You may have stepped aside in this battle, but the rest of us will fight on. For people like you. For people like your daughter. And most of all, for bacon.
LikeLike
Anyone who would ever say anything bad about you for this is not a decent human being. As someone with a relative who has autism, I can relate to how you feel. Regardless of your reasons why you chose to join the discussion, you did good Liz and you should be proud of yourself. After reading your very heartfelt piece here, I’m certainly proud of you and I’m sure anyone else who reads this will be too. Good luck with whatever you choose next.
LikeLike
Another blowtorch of an article. Your motivations and those of most GGers are pure in this way- its a concept foreign to the ideological hacks that we face.
You may never comment on GG again Liz but you’ll always be a GGer Liz and we will keep fighting for people like you and your daughter.
LikeLike
My son has no developmental disorders but he is fairly shy just as I was. Games help him come out of his shell. Hell games helped me do that. I made tons of friends because of gaming. One of my best friends who ive never met in person lives on the other side of the country. Thanks to gaming we know each other better than most people.
What the press has done is absurd but what the agg crowd has done is even worse. Stay strong lizzy
LikeLike
Wonderful post. I’m one of those people who has some autistic traits, but chalked up their social awkwardness and sensitivity to other factors until it hit me like a freight train, around age 21. Realization: the reason I didn’t relate well to other people had nothing to do with being a “smart kid” or a geek, it had everything to do with not understanding social motivations well but being savvy enough to fake it convincingly.
Autists are often accused of lacking empathy. I think it’s the opposite: we have an abundance of feelings we can’t process very well in bursts, and it’s the rest of the world who seem to have no sympathy for it.
LikeLike
Whilst I have no comprehension of the challenges you face raising your daughter I too joined the GamerGate conversation because of the stigma that Leigh Alexander and her ilk placed on my children with their broad brush. I despise bullies, which is who these people are, and vow to fight them tooth and nail until I can’t fight any longer. Lizzy, your reasons for getting involved were not selfish; they were, and are, the unselfish protective nature of a parent. I’m sad that you are no longer with us in this, but who can blame you after what you’ve faced. Our children and their safety come first.
w00f Miss you x
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Ontological Remote Beacon.
LikeLike
“My motivation, my first, primary motivation, for joining the discussion was selfish. And I don’t apologize for that.”
There is nothing to apologize for. I also support GamerGate for selfish reasons. I want better games, better games journalism and better academic analysis of games, for myself as a consumer. We are not noble knights in shining armor that come to save the state of gaming for selfless reasons. We are developers that fear for our future in an industry that values connections over merit and happily blacklists people who disagree, gamers that are sick of being blamed for society’s ills and having someone else’s ideology forced down our throats and, as seems to be the case with you, concerned parents that don’t take to kindly to the mischaracterization and slander against people that exhibit signs of Autism spectrum disorder (behaviour? I’m not up to date on the proper technical term, I mean no offence) and find joy and a means to express themselves in gaming.
Everyone has their own personal reasons to support this movement. And as long as you support the basic principles of GamerGate (freedom of speech, fact based arguments, ethical journalism and true equality for all) you are welcome in this movement, no matter your personal motivation.
LikeLike
+1
LikeLike
Incredible post – I wish I could write this well about my son, his autism, and our common love of gaming. And how this has been completely discounted by those who, I think, see diversity in terms of groups, instead of unique individuals. Thank you very much for writing this!
LikeLike
Anita Sarkesian published a series of YouTube videos in which she expressed an opinion. GamerGaters responded by sending her death threats en masse. You claim that you oppose censorship, yet you have supported a movement that has done nothing but censor people.
Also, the claim that the SJWs are coming to censor you is beyond absurd. All Sarkesian did was discuss things she disliked in video games. This is not censorship, this is expressing an opinion (which is yet again free speech). Claiming that the social justice warriors are trying to censor video games is like me claiming that your censor George Lucas’s creative geius when you complain about Jar Jar Binks.
LikeLike
I am fairly certain that this blog’s author has not sent Anita Sarkesian a death threat, so that is quite obviously a straw man argument – your next statement was that the gamergate movement has done nothing but censor people. That is demonstrably false, given the number of media outlets in which Sarkesian subsequently featured. And the absurd fact of being censored is demonstrably true, because those same outlets did not have anyone representing an opposing view of gamergate. And censoring videogames is one logical conclusion to the SJW bandwagon. I thought I read that they want to put a blurb in the ratings for games about the portrayal of women in the game and whether it is sexist.
I think you have an axe to grind, and you dont care who you hurt in doing so. And that is sad – I understand that you may have good intentions. But dont you label ‘en masse’ all those people who have different opinions than your own? So we agree to disagree I guess.
I think some intellectual honesty is needed in this debate. You dont know my family, my thoughts, who I am, and so on. You basically come with no information at all regarding the individuals who are self-described gamers, and decry this group as misogynists. That is simply false.
However, when asked about certain journalistic ethical practices regarding reviewing video games, do you have nothing to say? Color me surprised if you have spoken out about that.
LikeLike
This is a really dishonest argument that comes up all the time. Even Anita Sarkeesian herself doesn’t claim she’s just generating personal opinions, like “I prefer Sonic over Mario.” She’s presenting things she thinks are wrong with gaming culture that need to be fixed, and makes appeals to both players and companies to change these things. If you say you want to change things, then you have to accept that some people are going to oppose you. And this has nothing to do with threats. Well-adjusted people don’t disagree on that. But the people making threats don’t represent the people with legitimate disagreement, and calling someone names aren’t threats either. That she has gotten even a small number of credible threats is completely unacceptable, but the vast majority of opposition she gets is simply people telling her in very harsh terms that they don’t want what she’s selling.
LikeLike
Keep in mind that Ms. Sarkeesian also intends for her videos to be used as teaching tools, and that rather than ask students to discuss the merits of the material in order to determine whether or not her conclusions are sound, she asks them to proceed with discussion as if they are.
It’s also material that even were it simply her own opinion is still demonstrable nonsense. Rather than examining the material to reach a natural conclusion, she instead cherry-picks footage from games that she presents out of context in order to support her preconceived conclusions. She describes things as toxic on a widespread scale without ever describing how she came to that conclusion. She makes simple mistakes when describing games that suggest that she either doesn’t do her research, or is intentionally misrepresenting them. And as for the tropes she describes, she defines them herself and stretches or alters their meanings at will, and will minimize the importance of if not outright ignore games that subvert them.
This would not be a problem, but Ms. Sarkeesian isn’t just passing her videos off as opinion pieces. Again, she intends them to be used as educational material, which makes them outright unacceptable. Also, the fact that she holds developers responsible for failing to conform to her wholly subjective standards is a problem. She’s trying to shame them into making the games that she claims to want, which given her very public acknowledgement of the fact that she isn’t a gamer is kind of strange. She’s not playing them anyway, so why should she care?
LikeLike
“GamerGaters responded by sending her death threats en masse”
If you have evidence of who sent those threats, I urge you to send it to law enforcement. Otherwise that’s just casting lazy aspersions.
LikeLike
This is a lie. Whether you are the liar yourself, or merely sold on someone else’s lie, I cannot say. GamerGaters didn’t send en masse threats. In fact, I cannot find a *single* GamerGater I know who threatened *anyone*. All we know for certain is that Anita got some threats. Were they trolls stirring up trouble? Was it a false-flag operation (i.e. Anti-GamerGaters doing it in order to stir up trouble)? We cannot know for sure.
SJWs *do* want to censor. If you gave Anita dictatorial powers, how soon would she ban everything she didn’t like? There was an pro-life protester at a University (I can’t remember which off hand, but feel free to Google) who was in a free speech zone, exercising her rights to do her thing. Now, I’m a pro-choicer, generally speaking, but I fully acknowledge a person’s right to disagree with me. Anyway, some SJWs, led by a professor of that University, stole her signage, insulted her and then assaulted her when she tried to get her signs back. The professor gave excuses about being “triggered” by the signage, but we all know the real reason behind it: censorship. It’s not enough to respectfully disagree, they must eliminate all evidence of a counter-argument.
Since SJWs lack dictatorial powers, right now, they attempt the censorship through the use of “soft” power. They attempt to shutdown discourse and debate with accusations of misogyny, racism, etc… Remember the GameJournoPros list? They collude among themselves to present a unified front and skew the outside perspective against gamers. It’s not illegal, per se, but it’s profoundly unethical and I have no doubts that they *would* do illegal things if they thought they could get away with them.
LikeLike
This probably got lost in the spam of arguing that your twitter comments turned into but: GG is poorer for not having you involved. But just judging by the endless crap being spewed in that twitter thread it’s understandable why you’d have to step back. You gotta put your family first.
LikeLike
Thank you, that is so incredibly sweet. I definitely didn’t expect it to turn into… that. Lol
LikeLike
♥
LikeLike
Liz, I am not a social creature. I am an introvert. I prefer to be alone and do things by myself. I get a lot of my socialization through online friends, which is about all I can handle, and I spend most of my time indoors. I have never been diagnosed with autism, but I have been diagnosed with severe depression that CBT nor medicine seems to be able to treat.
I felt the same way reading the article by Ms. Alexander. On more than one occasion she has made it clear that she has contempt for people like me, and I have never felt comfortable with people like her trying to set the universal standard for video game culture so that it pathologized the way I am. They want everyone to be like them but it is not a thing that people can change, it is who they are. So I read what you write and I think I understand it. Thank you for standing up and being a voice for people like me.
LikeLike
I was going to write a response but I’m too busy trying to figure out how to put on these pants.
Seriously though I’ve known children like your daughter, and with love and some work she will turn out just fine. I can see her going to college, having a job, getting married, no problem. Nobodies like Leigh Alexander can’t stop that.
LikeLike
Wow there are a lot of comments already!! I was body-shamed by feminists for the past few years because I was too obsessed with gaming. Fuck the SJWs!!
LikeLike
I became a gamer because I was bullied throughout grade school and jr high. I joined gamergate because of the gamers are dead articles, it was a personal attack on who I am.
LikeLike
Gadzooks, that’s powerful.
Anyone that doesn’t catch a feel has no feels to catch.
Stay Based Liz; whatever else is true in life, you’re a pretty damn amazing person, your kids are lucky to have you ^^
LikeLike
Change the words ‘3 year old Daughter’ to ’14 year old Son’ and this is almost exactly the post I would have written about my reasons for becoming an active supporter of GamerGate. I wish you and your family the best Lizzy. Stay safe, stay well, and know that we will miss your voice.
LikeLike
Liz,
I am a chronic pain patient, and diagnosed with ADD. I battle bouts of depression. I have seen female friends battle fibro and lupus, and it something that just can’t be fully explained.
The general population cannot comprehend the psychological effects of an inability to tie your own shoes, cook yourself a meal, or wash a load of clothes, due to a life of all-encompassing pain.
They can’t understand the effects of not being able to leave your house or drive a car due to pain, and the loss of all your relationships with friends and family due to inability to participate in social functions.
The average person is unable to discern the difference between an inability to spend time with them, and apathy towards spending time with them.
I too have found solace in gaming, as have many other chronic pain patients that I’ve met through my years of treatment and pain management. I can’t describe how strongly I relate to what you have to say here.
My online gaming family does not care that I’m sometimes unable to leave the house, or that I’m not always able to shower and shave and dress up in a freshly pressed suit.
I would also say that gaming may have saved my life. It has pulled me out of some very dark times indeed. I have met some of the most amazing and supporting people in my life through gaming.
People wonder why we take this stuff so seriously… gaming is not a hobby for me. ***It is a life saving medical treatment.***
These perpetual outrage warriors sicken me. They talk about privelege… privelege is being able to wake up the morning as a normal, healthy human being. These imbeciles have no idea just how much privelege they have.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perpetual outrage warriors like people who read an article and decide MY BABY GIRL HOW DARE SHE when it’s not even about that?
LikeLike
I want to express my tremendous appreciation for your good work being an eloquent face for our community for all these months.
As you say, these people are the exact same social sect who, for their own elevation, transform schools into psychologically predatory environments for so many of our kids. For many, this behavior is simply a developmental phase born of insecurity over a lack of self-identifiable strengths: They find or develop a strength, reach peace with themselves, and move on, but a small subset, of which these “news cliques” are a prime example, do not.
They know they have no talents by which to substantively contribute to society and no inclination to develop any, and so, out of envy for those who do, and to avoid being confronted with this truth, they position themselves socially and use “who they know” to sow discord at the expense of the rest of us. They are parasites upon society, always taking, never giving, and sowing hatred for those who can and do contribute, and in the process warping the concept of status and in so doing isolating the personalities who wish to confront challenge from the resources necessary to do so.
I simply cannot engage dispassionately or jovially against these people the way you have. I’ve personally suffered too much, and watched so many others suffer too much, at the hands of people like them not to burn with unquenchable rage when I see such behavior. I suppose it comes from my faith in humanity, my faith that most people would become more discerning as they grow up, and set aside such childish and abusive behavior to help one-another and society advance. The way these people and organizations are given unquestioned authority, abuse that authority, and are still not questioned in what is supposed to be a free society is destructive to this faith, and I can’t forgive it.
This materialistic, status-obsessed, “keep up with the joneses”, us vs them mentality is the result of these people diverting the gullible’s energy into suppressing the productive half of humanity they envy so much. They are the pontiffs preaching ignorance from the pulpits of the medieval church. They are the corrupt emperors who have no clothes forcing political prisoners to battle to the death in the colosseum.
If not for them, we would be centuries further advanced in every way by now, and now, not satisfied with having isolated and thwarted our productive energy, they seek to come in and stamp out even our efforts to PRETEND to do the productive things we dreamt of.
LikeLike
Out of curiosity, do you genuinely think Leigh Alexander was even remotely talking about your daughter when she wrote that? I can’t claim to speak for her, but I’m almost certain she finds it understandable if a child, especially one that is going through what your daughter is, has issues communicating and behaving.
Your daughter hasn’t built an identity around a product category and attack people that criticise their sacred purchase. This is something you’re doing, and ironically, exactly what Alexander was talking about, by cherrypicking two lines out of an article and, to paraphrase, ‘concocting an online war about a social issue’, where there really isn’t one.
LikeLike
Leigh was doing exactly this. You see, she was insulting people; saying that gamers needed to get “social skills.” What she really meant was “gamers should be more like me.” I find it a sort of pot, kettle, black situation whenever I hear an SJW lecturing someone about social skills. Leigh was demeaning those who didn’t act like her. Under normal circumstances, this sort of thing could be safely ignored as another dumbass internet troll doing her troll thing. But, at the same time, Leigh was working to actively expel these people who were not like her from the community, working to change that community to be more like her. It’s an extreme form of narcissism on Leigh’s part.
Liz is looking to the future for her child, noticing that if people like Leigh continue doing what they are doing, her child will be marginalized and will suffer for it. SJWs are modern day fascists, just less physically violent about it. They want to remake the world in their image. And anyone who doesn’t fit that image must be dispensed with. Autistics definitely don’t fit that narrative — there is no place for them in the Social Justice Utopia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That you appear to believe that building an identity around your hobbies is unique to gamers suggests that not only are you a bigot, but a sheltered one at that. People of all walks of life do. You got comic-book fans, movie buffs, music fans, bookworms, sports fans, and so on.
But here’s the pertinent bit of information I wanna impart onto you; the folks that Leigh Alexander was talking about there? They didn’t attack people who criticize their “sacred purchase” either. They noticed that something fishy was going on with the state of ethics in videogame journalism, and the woman tried to shame them into silence with her disgusting, irresponsible article full of the very same ignorant stereotypes that gamers had just finally shed some decade or so earlier. Simply put, Leigh selfishly and irresponsibly set the perception of gamers back a decade or so just to save herself and her friends from having their ethical improprieties dragged front and center for all to see.
So no, gamers aren’t this thing that she wanted everyone to believe that we are, which is why folks took offense at it. People like you? You’re not doing yourself any favors by buying into it so readily and so easily. It suggest that you had a low opinion of us even before those articles were written, and well, while you think you’re wagging a self-important finger in our faces, what you’re actually doing is making your lamentable bigotry plain for all to see. I can’t speak for anyone else, but I find it difficult to take seriously people who cling to ignorance in order to justify their blind dislike of a group of people.
LikeLike
As someone who was there at the very beginning (I was one of the first ever people to be diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome back in 1987) and was born in 1970… the Uk picked up the baton after the Great Videogame Crash in 1983 and continued it through our Home Computer revolution and the BBC’s computer literacy programme that begat the Acorn Proton/BBC Micro and Clive Sinclair’s range of machines.
I was heavily bullied both physically and sexually through school – I escaped into the growing creativity of games. Along with the SF and other geek communities going on in leaps and bounds (I saw the Star Wars trilogy first time around on the big screen etc – this carried on into me being one of the first generation of Internet users in the UK – first came online in 1995 after first using email via Prestel and bulletin boards in the 80s, then on a DEC VAX at polytechnic in the early 90s), we were already building a highly egalitarian community – the mainstream is 20 years behind us.
In 1977/78, there were two main rolemodels on offer – the mainstream release was Blue Lagoon – Brooke Shields as some rich guy’s fucktoy on a Caribbean island – this persona was also visible in her Calvin Klein ad campaign… or Carrie Fisher as Leia Organa – with whom George Lucas SUBVERTED the whole Damsel trope. Consider how she took over during the firefight in the cell block escape sequence.
We also have had other strong equal female protagonists through the years. While the mainstream had manipulative bitches like Alexis Colby in around 1984… we had Ellen Ripley holding her own and taking down the Xenomorph queen in Aliens. It was obvious she was highly competent.
1990s – Lara Croft, Susan Ivanova (Babylon 5 XO), Talia Winters, LOADS of others… the geek community extrapolated forward from the trends in mainstream society.
Apparently the gaming community was a damn sight more egalitarian – I remember the sexes being equal in the arcades etc. Yes – there were different trends – as can be seen in the casual gameplay in some products – it’s uncanny how the mechanics in some of King’s products mix Bubble Bobble, Tetris and Minesweeper…. but also consider that many games are based around simulation. So it would make no sense for there to be a female PC in Madden – as it’s a FIFA simulator. Just as there would be no logic in a female PC in, say Das Boot.
We foresaw the fascist nature of a lot of the stuff in general society like the PATRIOT Act and UK’s Terrorism Act and RIPA when Babylon 5 played out very GW Bush-esque themes in series 3 – this was back in the 90s.
To the SJWs – back off. Give us our space to dream, to fantasise – it’s been the autistic-spectrum folk who gave you an advanced high-tech society.
Look at your Netflix client running on your tablet. This was borne out of all the work done in the ARPA project to put in the TCP/IP infrastructure we run over, Acorn developed the ARM processor architecture after the BBC B and Archimedes home computers; and we have Mercedes Carrera (another Aspie) who after working in aerospace and datacomms, went into the tech side of the porn industry. The same porn industry that engendered a critical mass of VHS VCRs before the mainstream studios started releasing their content on the format, and also who were the first with online credit card ordering, online video streaming etc.
Your Skype client – who did that first? The sex industry.
You wouldn’t have had Amazon if you hadn’t had the porn industry do it first. I remember back in 1995 when a Christian ministry like Insight for Living had a static order page you printed, completed and posted in – while Danni Ashe was providing video streams and taking credit card payments.
SJWs, back off. Let us dream and innovate.
LikeLike
Hey Lizzy!
Never thought you were suffering from those terrible diseases.
I have similar problems (chronic fatigue, and cronic pain), definetly CFS and possibly Fibromyalgia (I have also Atopic dermatitis since I was a child).
I already visited countless doctors, but so far I didn’t get any diagnosis for the pain and fatigue (I think in Germany it’s almost impossible to even be diagnosed with CFS or Fibromyalgia … they did not even mentioned it).
I am currently falling into despair, since the pain in my shoulders and arms is so strong, that I can’t even enjoy gaming anymore (playing with mouse and keyboard is almost impossible for me at the moment).
And I am afraid, that this pain won’t ever go away (problems started about 4 years ago … sometimes better, sometimes worse).
Maybe I am mistaken, but from reading your post, it sounds like things have gotten better for you health wise.
If you have any tips, any material to read, or some information about what therapy you’re doing, I’d be really thankful about a response.
(Not sure, if you can see my eMail, if you’d prefer to not speak about those things in detail in public.)
Also thank you for everything you’ve done in regards to Gaming and GamerGate!
It’s important to have women speaking out against the gamers-are-misogynistic-claims to show other women/girls, that they don’t need to be afraid to enter our community.
LikeLike
It’d be a really good idea to actually root out the misogynists instead of denying they exist, but it’s so much easier to spackle.
LikeLike
This, I didn’t intend to click it or read it, but it came across my feed twice today. And I am certainly glad that I did. I read the piece Leigh Alexander wrote, and it enraged me to no end. For me, she described by brother, and my husband. Both of whom are autistic. Both of whom found that with video games, possibilities were endless. Both whom found that video games are safe compared to the world outside, because in games they can relax. They can pretend that they don’t have their limitations. For my brother, he could actually communicate with people without a stutter, because of a chat window on the side where he could type it out. He was always so thrilled when people replied because it meant they understood him. For my husband, it’s a great stress reliver and helps with his severe anxiety levels.
And that woman, who knows nothing of actual gamers, who refuses to acknowledge that we are an international, multicultural, multi-ethnic, multi-gendered community of people. It’s inexcusable.
I’ve never seen any other post or comment or anything from you in the movement, but I thank you regardless. We all have our reasons for getting involved, some more than others. From what I can see, you’ve been a level head and voice of reason. Thank you.
LikeLike
I play games because I need them, it’s a way to calm myself down after a long rough day. I need it because it teaches me things, like how to communicate and stuff, since I have Autism myself, apparently. I’ve been upset and angry, but never called for anything drastic or terrible to happen to my opponents at GamerGate. The only thing I’ve wished for anti-GamerGaters, as well as for the game journalists who are corrupt and unethical, is for them to learn some goddamn respect for other people. This article makes me feel, like, feelings, and that’s a beautiful and wonderful thing for me. It just about gives me more reason to continue fighting the good fight of GamerGate, for ethics in game journalism, and maybe for them to respect their opponents, with decency, at the very least, as I have for them, publicly and privately.
LikeLike
As someone else said above, GG is poorer for your departure. You set an example of rational argument & principled behavior that I believe helped guide GG for the better.
I’m glad you returned to Twitter, even if it’s not for GG. You are, by all evidence, a lovely human being.
LikeLike
While I would consider myself pro gamergate, her article was not directed at you, nor your daughter. However, that is no excuse to insult, belittle and vilify the very audience that your job is centered around. That aside, I hope your baby girl continues to progress through any means necessary, and blossoms into a woman who couldn’t be further from Ms. Alexander.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Dhinged's Blog and commented:
To the smartest and most compassionate woman in GamerGate, I say Thank You.
LikeLike
So you confused a selectively quoted description of the stereotype of a grown person with your small child? No wonder nothing else here makes literally any sense.
LikeLike
Thank you for opening up like this. It was very moving. Weighs heavy on my heart as I think of little ones in my own life whom I dearly love.
You have a beautiful, compassionate heart and mind, which is why I and the rest of GamerGate love you so much.
Go in peace and God bless you and your family.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just read a few articles of your blog and you strike me as woman of great courage and intelligence, who knows where the real wolves are and won’t be bullied into being ashamed of seeing what she sees. Thank you, a fellow INFJ from France
LikeLike
Really quite powerful. Good to understand your motivations.
I’ve been done with #GamerGate for a while now. Totally get wanting to walk away from that, too.
LikeLike
I can support this.
LikeLike
Thank you. I hope that even if GG is long forgotten you guys keep posting stories like this and stick around. I don’t want to lose this.
LikeLike
Can your daughter concoct online ‘wars’ about social justice or ‘game journalism ethics’?
LikeLike
It’s pretty clear from the article that it wasn’t talking about people with autism but who cares about actually reading English when you could work yourself into a lather and take part in a massive, hate-fuelled harassment campaign directed at people who dared to have a different opinion than you. Hope you feel good about yourself.
LikeLike
get a load of this fuckboy here lol
LikeLike